Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Copa Catalunya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2012–13 Copa Catalunya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football tournament, failing WP:GNG Precedent at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005–06 Copa Catalunya (2nd nomination) JMHamo (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason given above.

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - "four-team football tournament"?? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I've corrected it now. Thanks! JMHamo (talk) 17:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both - there is consensus at AFD that individual stagings of this competition are not notable, and I see no reason why these two are any different. Giant Snowman 18:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Unlike the previous deletion, there are no lack of recent articles from various publications demonstrating that this competition meets WP:GNG (simply because there seems to be a lack of Catalan articles available on line from a decade ago on any subject!). Some examples are [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [[10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] Nfitz (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 2012-13 - per Nfitz, there certainly seems to be international coverage of this tournament. There needs to be significant work on the article to add sourced prose however as both contravene WP:NOTSTATS at the moment. Fenix down (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all. There are many reliable sources are shown above. NickSt (talk) 09:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per precedent and Wikipedia is not a sports almanac. Stifle (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see anything worth keeping in either of these articles. – Pee Jay 20:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although not well known, and in need of some expansion it seems to have ok cover in the links listed above. I don't see how this is worse than having a list of <obscure items>; the cup itself is notable, and this round of the cup have cover at least for the finals and semifinals, possibly also some of the other matches (disclaimer; sources translated with Google translate). Bjelleklang - talk 19:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.